I was just filtering through the photos and I came across this one that I took in Tasmania - Wrest Point Casino in Hobart in 2005.
This is Simon's cat, Toots. She's so cute! Sorry for the gratuitous cute pet photo but awwww....
This is a tribute to all that go pantless! From those brave little pantless muppets. To streakers whose relentless 'crashing' of Test matches and FIFA matches never ceases to amuse. To the ingenius ideas of that group in Austin, Texas who declared a national No Pants Day! I applaude you! Everyone should be able to roam free and pantless...
This is Simon's cat, Toots. She's so cute! Sorry for the gratuitous cute pet photo but awwww....


And how about the little man who plays keyboard (and most recently, a kiddie xylophone) on Rundle Street (and sometimes outside the Myer Centre)? A few years back, a friend of a friend actually got him to pose for a photo but I never got a copy. You'd think after decades of practicing and playing, this little keyboard 'prodigy' would get better, wouldn't you? But he hasn't improved musically at all. There goes my hope of getting my students to practice.
Only Adelaideans actually eat a meat pie drowned in pea soup. (Hands up who misses the Balfours Pie Cart outside the casino....).
Only Adelaideans like my drunken sister would actually approach the crazy man who collected cans in Rundle Mall and tell him that he changed her life (because he sang the wrong words in Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head when she was a tiddler). We called him 'The Man With The Cans'. Since then, he has disappeared off the face of the earth.




Arnold Schwarzenegger looks like Herman Munster

Animated or otherwise, George W Bush looks like a chimp.

I wanna find my fictional character. Which character do I look like, people? And please don't say Shrek. :)


I am a woodwind musician and an instrumental music teacher (in the private sector) who benefited from the IMS in public school system in the early 1990s. My parents could NOT AFFORD private tuition and my primary school did not offer music as a specialised subject. I had to wait until I was twelve until I could get free lessons at high school. If it wasn't for this, I would be probably a factory worker now. I have since then undertaken an honours degree in music performance and have performed in many ensembles of both a professional and community nature.
Music is an amazing tool of expression, and instrumental music is a perfect way for children to gain confidence, learn about perseverance, make friends and above all, experience the joy of music. This idea is, to put it simply, LUDICROUS.
Everyone who knows even the most minute detail about music knows that individual or specialised attention is required for any child or adult to learn a musical instrument. As one guest speaker said at the rally yesterday, "you wouldn't expect someone to learn to drive a car in groups of 30." Imagine this......30 kids forced to learn an instrument that they don't like, or even worse, doesn't suit them physically, in one class.
Imagine the lack of discipline, the noise, the horrible tuning of 30 beginner Year 5 violin students playing at once (or worst still, 30 trumpet players). It's hard enough to keep 2 chatty kids concentrating, let alone 30. Music is a specialised subject. This government wouldn't expect children to be forced to play basketball for a year if it didn't suit them physically or if they hated it. Why is this ANY DIFFERENT? .
And those children to whom the instrument is suited will receive less than adequate tuition and will probably lose interest in the music programme. Those children with talent or dedication will not be able to advance as they should because they will be lumbered with children who aren't as gifted, interested or dedicated to the instrument. Children learn at vastly different rates. You can't expect children to read music, to produce equal tones on the instrument, to be able to play the same piece of music together at the same level. I currently have five Year 8 students that began the same day. One child is barely able to produce a sound still and still struggles to put the instrument together whilst another is progressing very steadily towards a grade 2 AMEB level.
And what about kids that want to do music at a senior level. It's either 'ensemble tuition' or 'private lessons paid for by the parent'. So, as usual, it's the kids with rich parents who will be the ones with access to the jobs in music performance, not the ones in poorer families who are naturally more talented and hardworking at the instrument.
They call this a 'trial' period. What trial???? This proposal will in short, destroy the current IMS service, redistribute the teachers and stop any children from learning instruments individually in EVERY year except year 5. This is not a trial. Once it starts, there's no turning back. Too much damage will be already done and it'll be too costly to re-establish the IMS once it is disbanded which is what will happen in 2008 if this will go ahead. Not to mention that we would have lost most of the qualified music teachers to private systems and other non-arts related occupations because their current jobs are under threat.
The future implication for arts of all kinds in this state will be DISASTROUS. The future of our qualified music teachers' jobs aside, the problems this will cause in other organisations in the arts are undeniable. Most of these organisations are likely to collapse due to lack of interest and also lack of local talent.
There are many other terrible and drastic implications from this ridiculous proposal. But the most scarily problematic one is that most children educated in the public school system SIMPLY will not get the chance to learn an instrument at all. As far as this 'new and improved' service is concerned, if you're not in Year 5, tough shit. How is this an improved service? Thousands of children across the state will simply be denied the chance to learn at all or to even get a glimpse at what could be. Not everybody can afford $1000 a year in instrumental tuition and by the time the child earns enough money to pay for lessons themselves, it'll be too late for them to have a career in music. You wouldn't expect parents to fork out $1000 a year to learn maths, or science, or P.E. And rightfully so.
But of course, in a country that doesn't take the arts seriously, what do you expect? The day they cut the sport budget in this state will be the end of civilisation as we know it. But they're quite happy to destroy 9000 children's potential for a happy satisfying musical life.
And all this from a Rann government that claims to be 'for the common people' and pro arts! What a joke!
My suggestion if this goes ahead is to organise a public performance in the foyer outside Jane Lomax Smith's office of all the students in the state learning a musical instrument in a group of 15 or more. I think it'll take about 2 minutes of listening to it for them to re-evaluate their plan entirely.